No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Tibullus - Robert J. Ball: Tibullus the Elegist. A Critical Survey. (Hypomnemata, 77.) Pp. 253. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1983. Paper, DM 59.
Review products
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2009
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b0f0/8b0f0212f0a939d563dae19d9f08ce933da06d93" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1987
References
1 For a recent sharp and relevant attack on the ‘biographical fallacy’, cf. de Vries, J. G., Mnemosyne 36 (1983), 249 Google Scholar: ‘These tendencies’ 〈i.e. to treat literature as autobiography〉 ‘are objectionable when they appear in the explanation of individual passages or works; they become perverse, when dominating in a history of literature, which then (at best!) will degenerate into a series of biographies.’
2 It is perhaps even more worrying in a ‘critical survey’ to find the author advancing without citation of source an excellent interpretation by someone else: cf. p. 58 n. 20 ad fin., where the credit should have been given to Lee (1975) on Tib. 1.3.77.