No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 396 note 1 Metrical fragments show that the first ι was long, as in Ἀρτεμῑσ⋯α Ar. Thesm. 1200: Liddell Scott go out of their way to put a short mark over it, and also over ⋯ρτεμισ⋯α.
page 397 note 1 See p. 782 d (iv. p. 217 Schweighaeuser, iii. p. 20 Kaibel) which quotes Cratinus 
and continues 
schol. Ar. Pax. 1244, Ἀγκ⋯λη in Hesych. and Bekk. Anecd. 337.
page 398 note 1 This interpretation was wrong; see Schmidt Hesych. i. p. 23, Meineke Com. ii. p. 180.
page 398 note 2 Anacr. fr. 53 
possibly sound, like Sophocles' 
.
page 398 note 3 The (
Critias in Ath. 600 e) struck the head of the Ζ⋯νης: Soph. fr. 494, 3 
. In Aesch. Cho. 288 we find 
, where the sense is certainly 
, which occurs in Lycophron 436. Since Lycophron's verse is 
, it really looks possible that the phrases may somehow have exchanged places. But cf. Lycophr. 981.
page 398 note 4 Hesych. has also ⋯γκ⋯λως: ⋯ποτ⋯μως. These are terms in stylistic criticism; but they mean different things. It is perhaps merely a slip that has put one as an interpretation of the other: I do not venture to suggest ⋯γκ⋯λας: ⋯ποτομ⋯ς from Eur. Or. 1476.
page 398 note 5 Or τομ⋯δων: either would do. In Aeneas Tact. 24 
there is a v.l. ⋯κτομ⋯δα: see Orelli p. 204. Hesych. gives 
.