Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:31:56.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Stupefied Menelaus: Agamemnon 412–13

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Trevor J. Saunders
Trevor J. Saunders
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , December 1966 , pp. 253 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 253 note 1 A complete list, though entertaining, would drive the text into the roof of the page. See Wecklein, N., Aeschyli Agamemnon (1885), Appendix, p. 19Google Scholar; Housman, A. E., J. Phil, xvi (1888), 254 ff.Google Scholar; Dawe, R. D., Repertory of Conjectures on Aeschylus, 1965Google Scholar. The fullest discussion is in E. Fraenkel's edition of the Agamemnon (1950), ad loc. I am grateful to Dr. W. G. Arnott and Professor P. T. Stevens for helpful criticism of an early draft of this note.

page 253 note 2 ‘Gentler Medicines in the Agamemnon’, C.Q. xiv (1964), 7–8.Google Scholar

page 254 note 1 I assume with Fraenkel and Page that in view of the strophe a syllable must have dropped out after συνορμ⋯νοις (Fraenkel reads ⋯π⋯νθεια, Page συνορμ⋯νοισι), and that Ἑλλ⋯δος will become Ἔλλᾱνος. to respond to σιγᾱς.

page 254 note 2 This conjecture was adopted by N. Wecklein (Teubner, 1888), A. Sidgwick (1898), Headlam, W. (J. Phil, xxiii (1895), 305–306)Google Scholar, P. Groeneboom (1944), and P. Ubaldi (1954).

page 255 note 1 Cf. Lindholm, Elmo, Stilistische Studien, 102–103 (Lund, 1931)Google Scholar, and Fraenkel, vol. iii, 574.