Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:50:37.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plautus, Rudens 83–88

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

H. D. Jocelyn
H. D. Jocelyn
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 1966 , pp. 148
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

2 Cf. Engelmann, , Annali Ist. Corresp. Archeol. xliv (1872), 5–18Google Scholar, Beiträge zu Euripides, i. Alkmene (Berlin, 1882), pp. 4ff.Google Scholar, Archäologische Studien zu den Tragikern (Berlin, 1900), pp. 52–62Google Scholar; Wilamowitz, , Euripides' Herakles (Berlin, 1889), p. 298 n. 54Google Scholar; Séchan, , Études sur la tragédie grecque dans ses rapports avec le céramique (Paris, 1926), pp. 242–248Google Scholar; Webster, , Studies in Later Greek Comedy (Manchester, 1953) P. 87Google Scholar; Sedgwick, , Plautus, Amphitruo (Manchester, 1960), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

3 Cf. Fraenkel, , Plautinisches im Plautus (Berlin, 1922), pp. 68–69 (PP. 64–65 of the Italian translation (Florence, 1962)Google Scholar; see the addenda, p. 403, on ‘Claudiana tonitrua’); Marx, , Plauti Rudens, Abh. Sächs. Ak., Phil.-Hist. Kl. v, xxxviii (1928), p. 73Google Scholar; Thier-felder, , T. Maccius Plautus, Rudens (Heidelberg, 1962), p. 107.Google Scholar

4 Fraenkel's suggestion that Plautus' audience knew this play from a Latin adaptation and that Plautus rather than Diphilus coined the phrase under discussion is attractive.

5 For this mode of referring to the heroes and heroines of particular tragedies cf. Cicero Tusc. iv. 67 Naeuianus ille … Hector, Fin. iv. 62 Enni Alcmeo, Rep. i. 30 Zethum illum Pacuui.

6 It must be admitted, however, that the reaction of the Plautine Alcmena (Amph. 820–930) is surprisingly dignified. Roman mores may be influential here.

7 In the introduction to his edition of the Rudens (Leipzig, 1887), pp. viii–ixGoogle Scholar, F. Schoell seems to interpret the second element of the contrast as being the shifty and faithless character of the heroine. This was hardly a happy idea.

8 I am grateful to Professor C. O. Brink for reading a version of this note.