Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:08:46.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plautus, Rudens, 603 ff.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

O. Skutsch
Affiliation:
University CollegeLondon

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 12 note 14 Circumstances are almost identical in 599a, except that there a few letters in A can now be read to make sense; see C.R. lvi (1962), 120.

page 13 note 1 Ritschl, Opusc. ii. 487 f.; Ritschl's observation that the omission of esse would be against Plautine usage is a little questionable, and is certainly not applicable here since an esse in line 603a may have served for 604 as well.

page 13 note 2 This point is rightly insisted upon by Frei, P., Die Flexion griechischer Namen der ersten Deklination im Latein, Winterthur, 1958, p. 22.Google Scholar