Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T13:07:33.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pharsalia Nostra1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. P. Postdate
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , June 1905 , pp. 257 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1905

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

With apologies to the shade of Lucan, ix. 985, and Professor Housman, Classical Review, p. 129.

References

page 257 note 2 I have indicated its lines in the Historical Introduction to my edition of Book VII. pp. xxxv. sq.

page 259 note 1 The origin of this confusion I have discussed at length in my note on Lucan vii. 872. It is possible that amongst the contributory causes was a misunderstanding of the restricted meaning of Thessalia, for which see below.

page 259 note 2 The passages are cited in Pape's Dictionary of Proper Names, s.u. φ⋯ρσαλος.