No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 150 note 1 References throughout to Dind. Poet. Seen. As far as possible examples other than those given in M. T. are quoted.
page 150 note 2 To my ear oὐ μἠ does not even sound like the beginning of an interrogation.
page 150 note 3 This also applies to cases in whieh it is used With the fut., II. x. 330 (Monro H.G. § 358, b).
page 151 note 1 Dr. Verrall would add Aesch. Sept. 201 (183), ἔνδον δ’ οὖσα μ⋯ βλ⋯βην τιθ⋯, ‘at home she is like enough to be in the way.’ See note ad loc.
page 151 note 2 In one of these cases, Lys. 219 D, there is another verb ⋯ξαπατᾷ coordinated with ᾖ, but this does not affect the argument.
page 152 note 1 The authors include Aesch., Soph., Eur., Aristoph., Herod., Thucyd., Xen., Plato, Aeschin., Demosth., Isaeus.
page 153 note 1 I have assumed that the μἠ after verbs of fearing is the prohibitive not the interrogative μἠ of M. T. 369, 376, to which I would add for purposes of comparison Ar. Lys. 326.
page 153 note 2 Compare the construction ‘ὅπως νρ ἔσɛι,’ Eur Cycl. 595; where the dependent conjunction ὅπως clearly shows that this imperatival expression also went through a stage of subordination before it was used independently.
page 153 note 3 If I apprehend Prof. Goodwin's meaning M. T. § 263, he himself regards μἠ oὐ as necessarily dependent, or at least does not believe in the existence of any independent instance.
page 153 note 4 If in Aesch. Ag. 1640 (1618) μἠ should be read (v.l. μ∘ι, μ ν), it was probably earlier, since it is there already stereotyped.