Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:54:45.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Cicero1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

E. Courtney
E. Courtney
Affiliation:
King's College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 1960 , pp. 95 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 96 note 1 See also Trans. Cambr. Phil. Soc. iii. 145.

page 97 note 1 Since I have diverged into patristic regions, I take the occasion to add a testimonium; the phrase curiosos oculos in Lactant. Inst. iii. 20. 2, in connexion with Clodius, is due to Har. Resp. 37 (Brandt notes the relationship of the passages). The quotations of Quir. 4, Har. Resp. 39 by Vincent of Beauvais, on which cf. Ullman, C.P. xxvii (1932) 32, are of no practical importance.

page 97 note 2 I hope it will not be ascribed to ingratitude if I take the opportunity of pointing out another error of omission in this work. The Berne scholia on Lucan ii. 125 have: ‘Marius Celium tr. pl. Sillanum de Tarpeio saxo praecipitavit. Sex. Lucilius anni superioris tr. pl. …’ This seems to have been completely overlooked by the reference books (Drumann–Groebe, M. Ziegler, Niccolini, R.-E., Broughton) not only as confirming the disputed name Lucilius, but also as giving a tribune Caelius or Coelius not mentioned elsewhere. This scholium contradicts Dio Cass. fr. 102. 12 Boiss. ὁ υἱὸς Μαρίον … ἄλλον (δήμαρχον: clearly the well-known Lucilius) ἀπὸ τοῦ Καπιτωλίον κατεκρήμνισεν, ὄπερ οὐδεὶς ἄλλος ἐπεπόνθει.

page 97 note 1 In Baiter's apparatus.

page 97 note 2 Magmenta are a kind of exta.

page 97 note 3 This instance of intransitive aperire should be added to Thes. L.L. ii. 216. 21–22.