Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T01:54:02.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The New Lyric Fragments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. M. Edmonds
Affiliation:
Jesus College, Cambridge

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1916

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 97 note 1 Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Part X., 1914, see C.R., May, 1914.

page 97 note 2 If a certain German restorer of the Berlin Alcaeus could see a tracing of his restoration he would be the first to admit the cogency of my argument. The line of his initial letters is like a flight of tumble-down steps.

page 98 note 1 And Papiri della Soc. ital. i. 123Google Scholar, where the fragment is slightly wider but extends only to 1. 10 1–10 So Wilamowitz loc. cit., but; παρ⋯στα for παρε⋯η, πρ⋯τοι for λ⋯τοι, γ⋯ρ Ἂρευος ἔργον for Tροΐας ⋯λεθρον, and ⋯δον τ⋯λεσσαι for 18 P ηραν with ι wrongly inserted after η 20 P ραπ ι

page 98 note 2 The ι of the Papyrus was added, I take it, wrongly but plausibly. Veitch even gives as regular for Herodotus. For the Atticisation of ā see below.

page 100 note 1 See C.R. June, August, 1909.

page 102 note 1 See C.R. December, 1909.