Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:33:37.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Némethy's Tibvllvs and Lygdamvs - Albii Tibulli Carmina: accedunt Sulpioiae Elegidia. Edidit, adnotationibus exegeticis et criticis instruxit Geyza Némethy, Academiae Litterarum Hungaricae Sodalis. Budapestini. MCMV. 8¾ × 5½. Pp. 348, Sewed. Kron. 6. - Lygdami Carmina: accedit Panegyricus in Messallam. Edidit, adnotationibus exegeticis et criticis instruxit Geyza Némethy, Academiae Litterarum Hungaricae Sodalis. Budapestini. MCMVI. 8¾ × 5½ Pp. 180, Sewed. Kron. 3.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 450 note 1 Referred to and partly quoted in the Excursus.

page 450 note 2 I.e. formerly his slave, lent by him to Cynthia; see Propert, IV. (V.) vii. 35–6, viii. 37, 79, 80.

page 450 note 3 Several of which were pointed out by Dr. Postgate in his Select Elegies of Propertius and in his Selections from Tibullus and Others.

page 451 note 1 See The Journal of Philology, Vol. xxviii. p. 152 (1901)Google Scholar; and compare Moretum 16, 17 ‘Fusus erat terra frumenti pauper aceruus; Hinc sibi depromit quantum—’

page 451 note 2 V being the codex Vaticanua, G the Guelferbytanus, and C the Cuiaeianus of Scaliger now in the possession of the present writer.

page 452 note 1 The statement of Lewis and Short that subtusus occurs in Boëth. Geom. i. p. 1180 as an epithet of anguius is false.

page 452 note 1 At p. 135 of his ‘Castigationes in Catullum Tibullum Propertium, Lutetiae 1577;’ but discarded by him in favour of subfusa; ‘facile diuinatu,’ he wrote, ‘quare pudicitia expugnata erubescat.’

page 453 note 1 Cited by Dr. Postgate in The Journal oj Philology, xxv. p. 62 (1897)Google Scholar, where he proposed to read here ’hino ut praetextus.’

page 453 note 2 In Addenda to Vol. II. pp. 176 and 179.

page 454 note 1 Postgate's, J. P.Selections from Tibullus and Others, p. 105.Google Scholar

page 455 note 1 Postgate's, J. P.Selections from Tibullus and Others, p. 127.Google Scholar

page 456 note 1 See Tyrrell's, R. Y.. review of ‘Wiekham's Horace, Vol. ii.’ in The Classical Review, Vol. v. p. 170.Google Scholar

page 456 note 2 ‘Pallam,’ he wrote, ‘expectabam in Apolline; quandoquidem is proprius deo amictus (cf. supra II. v. 8) olim omnino natitms, hinc citharoedis communis. Verum in ea describenda laborare adeo Tibullum ‘[Lygdamum]’ aegre fero. Pentameter saltern friget uel maxime.’.