Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:22:08.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lex Servilia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

E. Badian
E. Badian
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1954 , pp. 101 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 101 note 1 v. Balsdon, P.B.S.R. xiv, 1938, pp. 98 f. For the new date suggested for Glaucia's law, v. Piganiol, C.R.A.I., 1951, pp. 58 f.

page 101 note 2 Hill, , Roman Middle Class, p. 122Google Scholar, tries to revive their doubts on this point.

page 101 note 3 Cf. De Or. ii. 223, Brut. 161, Pro Cluent. 140.

page 101 note 4 Cic. De Inv. i. 92; Brut. 164; etc.

page 101 note 5 v. Cicero passim and especially De Or. i. 225.

page 101 note 6 e.g. De Leg. iii. 42; De Off. iii. 47; Pro Com., ap. Asc., p. 67C—the last two with Scaevola Pontifex, with whom he is coupled also at the end of our passage.

page 101 note 7 v. especially Cic. Brut. 224.

page 101 note 8 Balsdon, op. cit., pp. 106 f. The date 122 seems preferable. Cf. an article in A.J.P. 1954 (forthcoming).

page 101 note 9 F.L.R.A. 7, 76 (= 83) f.

page 102 note 1 C.A.H. ix, p. 169—not shaken by more recent research.

page 102 note 2 Cic.De Off. and Pro Corn. (v. p. 101, n. 6 above) cf. Pro Balbo 48.