Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:57:15.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Law of succession under Diocletian - O. E. Tellegen-Couperus: Testamentary Succession in the Constitutions of Diocletian. Pp. xiii + 231. Uitgeverij Terra: Zutphen, 1982.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2009

B. W. Frier
Affiliation:
University of Michigan

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Wieacker, F., RH 49 (1971), 201223Google Scholar; Watson, A., TR 41 (1973), 1934Google Scholar, and Tulane Law Review 48 (1974), 11221128Google Scholar; Schnebelt, G., Reskripte der Soldatenkaiser (1974), esp. 193201.Google Scholar

2 For statistics on volume of rescripts, see Honoré, T., Emperors and Lawyers (1981), 140143.Google Scholar

3 E.g., Taubenschlag, R., Opera Minora, I (1959), 2177Google Scholar; the essay was first published in 1923.

4 See Kaser, M., Das Römische Privatrecht, II (1975), 1819Google Scholar, with further bibliography, esp. Amelotti, M., Per l'Interpretatione della Legislazione Privatistica di Diocleziano (1960).Google Scholar

5 Compare T. Honore, (cited note 2) 135–8, and cf. 104: ‘the office a libellis… remained, even more strikingly than before, the guardian of the laws and mores of the Roman people, the custodian of true legal doctrine and discipline’. See also MacMullen, R., Roman Government's Response to Crisis (1976), 9495.Google Scholar