Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:57:16.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Latin Sapphic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

A. W. Verrall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 17 , Issue 7 , October 1903 , pp. 339 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1903

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 340 note 1 I do not say that the Latin word-accent either originally was a ‘beat’ or had become such by the age of Augustus. That it then affected the beat, is seen in all branches of Augustan poetry. What precisely it was or had been, we shall hardly know until we can hear ancient Romans recite.

page 340 note 2 Prof. Sonnenschein gives another reason for the caesura (p. 253) and quotes from Prof. Eickholf yet another, both ex hypothesi valid, but not, I think, so obvious as the above.

page 341 note 1 I should say that I know them only through Prof. Sonnenschein. Prof. Eickhoff is, it seems, now prepared to say that the Greek Sapphic, the ode π∘ικιλθρ∘νε for instance, is 2-time. At present 1 find this incomprehensible.

page 342 note 1 vv. 14, 35, 58, 59, 61.