No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 68 note 1 The inscriptional material, carefully collected and conveniently put together in a different sense and for a different purpose, is contained in Th. Eckinger's pamphlet die Orthographic Lateinischer Wörter in Griechischen Inschriften (München, [1892]), to which booklet (141 pp.) I refer once for all in order save time and space and to avoid needless and disturbing repetition by constant reference to the same source.
page 68 note 2 Griechische Urkunden zu Berlin.
page 70 note 1 I remark against Prof. Blass (The Pron. Of Ancient Greek, English trans, p. 35) that if linteum were faithfully rendered by λ⋯ντε∘ν this form would require contraction to λιντ∘⋯ (like κ⋯νε∘ν καν∘⋯ν), and thus become almost irrecognizable.
page 70 note 2 For the converse process, that is to say for the change of Creek u and o during Graeco-Roman times, compare: 
(K. Brugmann, Gr. Gram.3 51).
page 71 note 1 For the converse process of changing Greek υ(= V) into ου during Graeco-Roman times compare: 
for 
for Eὔτυχ∘σ (Blass. Pron. 75), ἱκετε∘νσ⋯σης(Brugmann Gr. Grant. 50).
page 72 note 1 Compare Schol. in Dion. Thr. 346, 23(Hilgard): 
; also Quint. Inst. I. 4. IO.: nisi quis putat etiam ex tribus vocalibus syllabam fieri.