Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T00:18:34.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Katharsis - Alexandre Ničev: La Catharsis Tragique dans Aristote. Nouvelles Contributions. Pp. 175. Sofia: Université de Sofia, Kliment Ohridski, 1982.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2009

Ian Rutherford
Ian Rutherford
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Oxford and Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , October 1984 , pp. 212 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The exceptions include Lucas, D. W., CR 22 (1972), 204–205Google Scholar and Rees, B. R., CR 25 (1975), 146.Google Scholar

2 Review of L'Enigme in Izvestija AN SSSR, Serija literatury i jazyka (Moscow) 30 (1971), 6, 560–562.Google Scholar

3 Aristotel i antichnaya literatura teoriya in Aristotel i antichnaya literatura (Moscow, 1978), 13–14.Google Scholar

4 My translation.

5 Losev is able to demonstrate (p. 209) that a theory similar to N.'s was proposed over a century ago by Kock, Theodor in his Über den Aristotelischen Begriff der Katharsis in der Tragödie und die Anwendung auf König Oedipus (Elbing, 1851)Google Scholar. N.'s theory differs from Kock's mainly in the former's emphasis on doxa. At any rate, N. does not seem to have thought Kock's theory worth mentioning in La Catharsis.