Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:27:35.452Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John's Dialogus De Oratoribus - P. Cornelius Tacilus, Dialogus de Oratoribus, Erklärt Dr.Constantin von John: Berlin, Weidmannsche Buchhandlung1899. Pp. vii + 164. Price 2 Mark 10 Pf.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

W. Peterson
W. Peterson
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montreal.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 1900 , pp. 68 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1900

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 68 note 1 See an article entitled ‘La eritica del “dialogo deglioratori” nell' ultimo decennio,’ by Valmaggi, L., in the Rivista di Filologia for April, 1899Google Scholar.

page 69 note 1 The references are to Halm's text (Teubner, 1889).

page 70 note 1 Cp. these passages in detail: 36, 4, ‘Nam etsi horum quoque temporum oratores ea consecuti sunt quae composita et quieta, et beata re publica tribui fag erat, tamen ilia perturbatione ac licentia plura sibi adsequi videbantur, &c. 37, 19, ‘Quae mala sicut non accidere melius est isque optimus civitatis status habendus est in quo nib.il tale patimur, ita cum acciderent ingentem eloquentiae materiam subministrabant.’

page 71 note 2 The personality of Maternus may again, it seems to me, be detected in the phrase ‘cum in plerisque iudiciis crederet populus Bomanus sua interesse quid iudicaretur,’ 39, 19.