No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
1 It is instructive to compare his vocabulary with that of the New Testament; he has none of those peculiarities of the latter which I have discussed in J. Bibl. Lit. 52, 1933, 133 ff.Google Scholar
2 For Quis heres, reference should now be made to Goodenough's, E. R. article ‘A Neopythagorean source in Philo Judaeus,’ Yale Classical Studies, III (1932), 117 ff.Google Scholar, which can hardly have been available in time to be mentioned.