Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-8gtf8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-22T15:23:54.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Iphigenia at Aulis - Gudrun Mellert-Hoffmann: Untersuchungen zur ‘Iphigenie in Aulis’ des Euripides. (Bibl. der Klass. Altertumswiss., 28.) Pp. 160. Heidelberg: Winter, 1969. Paper, DM. 18.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

James Diggle
James Diggle
Affiliation:
Queens' College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 178 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 I cannot allow Funke's howler on p. 289 n. 1 (οἴ at 1267 referred to the Trojans instead of the Greeks), which is unnoticed by Mellert-Hoffmann, to remain unexposed.

2 Dubious parallels abound: p. 96, ἀντιλαβή in iambics is not a ‘vergleichbar Freiheit’ to the division between speakers of anapaestic dimeters; p. 96, προτίων at Pl. Leg. 947 d is a corruption of ποτίμων and therefore irrelevant; p. 97, σύντονα at Hipp. 1361 does not mean ‘gleichmässig’; p. 98, at Andr. 1265 the accusatives are governed more by ἐλθών than by ἴζον; p. 103, no one has yet provided an exact parallel for ὄδε in 72 (in the examples here cited the person referred to by the pronoun has been named closely before: for further examples see Lloyd-Jones, , C.R. lxxix [1965], 241–242)Google Scholar; p. 131, to appeal to the placing of a lyrical duet between iambics in the Phoenissae as an ‘ähnliche Rahmenkomposition’ to the placing of an iambic monologue in the middle of anapaestic dialogue is an eloquent confession of penury.