Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:21:33.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immortality in Plato's Symposium: A Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

J. V. Luce
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Dublin

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 138 note 1 Assuming here, and throughout, that the Phaedo was written before the Symposium. Hackforth says that it is impossible to decide which is the earlier, but later writes as though the Phaedo came first. In the five chronological lists of the Platonic dialogues cited by Ross, W. D., in his Plato's Theory of Ideas, p. 2, Wilamowitz is the only critic to place the Phaedo before the Symposium.Google Scholar

page 139 note 1 Cf. Bury, Symp. (ed. 2), p. xlv, n. 2: ‘In other words, ⋯θανασ⋯α may be used not simply of quantity but of quality of existence. This is probably the case in 212a: “immortality” is rather “eternal life” than “ever-lastingness”, as connoting “heavenliness” or the kind of life that is proper to divinities’.

page 139 note 2 There is, perhaps, some slight confirmation for this thesis in Plato's use of the comparative ⋯θανατώτερος in 209 c 7.

page 139 note 3 Cf. Plato, Epinomis 982 a 2: μακρα⋯ωνα β⋯ον … ζω⋯ς said of the heavenly bodies.

page 140 note 1 These references in Bury loc. cit., p. xliv. n. 2.