Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:06:20.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Hypothesis of Euripides' Hippolytus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

John Whittaker
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a study of this technique and errors resulting therefrom see Brinkmann, A., Rh. Mus. lvii (1902), 481497Google Scholar. On the antiquity of such errors cf. also Schwyzer, H.-R., Mus. Helv. xxvi (1969), 269 para. 35Google Scholar. Brinkmann (op. cit. 492 f.) refers to two instances in a Leiden magical papyrus where the letters κατ, erroneously introduced from the margin into the text, served not as catchwords but as marginal reference-marks (= κάτω) referring the reader down either from the upper margin to the body of the text or from a lateral margin to the foot of the page. It is not likely that the κατ (or equivalent) attached to ἥτις can have served the same purpose; a more adequate indication of the correct position of ἥτις would be required in the form either of a catchword or of an interlinear reference-mark, but there is no catchword apart from κατ, and if there had been an interlinear reference-mark then ἥτις would be unlikely to have gone astray.