No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 259 note 1 See Bevan, E. R., The House of Seleucm, ii. p. 107, n. 6Google Scholar. Mommsen says that ‘extensive privileges were granted to the Byzantines,’ by Antiochus with a view to his war with Rome (History of Rome, Engl. transl., ii. p. 450). I cannot find the evidence for this.
page 258 note 2 See Knbitschek's article on Byzantion in Pauly-Wissowa, iii. 1138, where references are given for the events mentioned above.
page 258 note 3 His claim that he was the son of Perseus.was false, though Pausanias, whose work was written fifty or sixty years later than the Annals, admits it (vii. 13. 1: 
.
page 260 note 1 The language of Floras, who wrote not long after Tacitus, is an exception which proves the rule: he calls Andriscus ‘ille imaginarius et scenicus rex’ (ii. 14).
page 260 note 2 E.g. by Furneaux: ‘as one meanly born.”
page 260 note 3 Livy, Epit. xlix.
page 260 note 4 E.g. xv. 70: exim Annaei Lucani caedem imperat.… Senecio posthac. et Quintianus et Scaevinus non ex priore vitae mollitia, mox reliqui coninratorum periere, nullo facto dictove memorando. iii. 62: primi omnium Ephesii… proximi Magnetes,… Aphrodisienses posthac ct Stratonicenses… exim Cyprii.…
page 260 note 5 Both meanings of ‘degener’ are found in the Annals. For the original meaning see i. 40, iv. 61; for the degenerate meaning see xii. 51.