Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:53:21.672Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Havet's Latin Textual Criticism - Manuel de critique verbale appliqué aux textes latins, parLouis Havet, Membre de l'Institut, Professeur au Collège de France. 10″ × 8″. Pp. viii + 481. Paris: Hachette, 1911.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. P. Postgate
J. P. Postgate
Affiliation:
Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 25 , Issue 7 , November 1911 , pp. 218 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1911

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 219 note 1 My italics.

page 220 note 1 The figures are M. Havet's convenient marks for indicating the metrical character of a verse or part of one.

page 222 note 1 This whole section on ‘Obscurity’ swarms with examples of the danger of approaching ancient texts with modern prepossessions. Perfectly sound passages such as Plautus Bacch. 615, Miles 115, Ter. Haut. 23, 266, Cic. Cat. m. 52 are declared to be corrupt simply because they have not been read as a Roman would have read them. In the passage of Tibullus any monosyllable might have been put for hunc and still the reader would have paused instinctively after uirum.