No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Harley Ms. 2610, and Ovid, Met. I. 544–546
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1919
References
page 140 note 1 The tourth line (‘ Qua…figuram’), which Dr. Magnus ascribes to ε is not in the manuscript. (Dr. Gilson; the Keeper of the MSS., has very kindly verified the point, and endorses my report.)
page 140 note 2 Or, according to others, Tellus and Ladon: see Munro and Aetna, line 6, and the works there cited.
page 140 note 3 Lines 577 to 578 might be thought to imply that the father had not intervened, Earth being apparently the agent.
page 140 note 4 But cf. 13. 180 (q.v), Et ldquo;fer opem, Galatea mihi, mihi ferte, parents.”
page 141 note 1 Since this was writtem, I notice that Merkel in teh Preface to his second edition also cites these two passages from Aeschylus. He keeps the half-line which others reject; but his text of the whole is not altogether satisfactory.
page 141 note 1 If in some ‘forbear’ of theirs line 544 began with fessa (see 5. 618), not victa, the omission might easily have occurred.
page 141 note 2 To the two examples in Ellis (Anecdot. Oxon. Class. Ser. I. 5, anni 1885) at 2 823 and 3, 172, add another, viz 2 755, which is not ‘omitted’ but placed before 754 :—a total of three only in some two thousand lines and more.
page 141 note 3 = the symbol for ldquo;equals.”
page 141 note 4 vel ‘dehiscas!’