Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-b4m5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T13:51:06.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Haplology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

M. L. West
M. L. West
Affiliation:
University College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 1965 , pp. 139 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 140 note 1 The same applies to the assumption of achaplology at Lucilius 123 inde Diciarchitum populos. Dicarchitum is to be read; cf. Marx ad loc.

page 140 note 2 Hainsworth says that the haplology here is ‘generally accepted’. It is not accepted in the excellent (and only) modern commentary on the poem, that of C. F. Russo.

page 141 note 1 The facts are given by Chantraine, i. 84–85.