Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:20:00.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hale and Buck's Latin Grammar - A Latin Grammar. By W. G. Hale and C. D. Buck. Ginn and Co., Boston, U.S.A., and London. Pp. xi + 388. 1903. 4s. 6d.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. A. Sonnenschein
Affiliation:
The Univeristy, Birmingham

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1905

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 66 note 1 The distinction between quid Momac faciam? (§ 503) and quid te invitem?(§ 513. 1) is unnaturally magnified by calling the first a ‘volitive subjunctive in questions of deliberation or perplexity’ and the second a ‘subj. of obligation or propriety.’ The difficulty that ‘there is no shade of deliberation’ in the latter might be simply met by abolishing the term ‘deliberative’ altogether, as really too narrow, and recognizing that in both cases the subj. expresses what ought to be (or is to be) done. The negative is, of course, non in both cases.

page 68 note 1 Here I miss an example like eras donabcris haedo ‘you shall be presented’ = I will present you.

page 68 note 2 I doubt, however, whether the ‘shall’ of § 507. 1 ought to be described-as equivalent to a ‘will,’ e.g. in the translation of famam qui terminet astris ‘who shall ( = will) make the stars the boundary of his fame.’