Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:53:55.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gratvm Opvs Agricolis - K. D. White: Roman Farming. (Aspects of Greek and Roman Life.) Pp. 536; 81 plates, 12 line-drawings, maps, and plans. London: Thames & Hudson, 1970. Cloth, £4·50. - K. D. White: A Bibliography of Roman Agriculture. (Bibliographies in Agricultural History, no. 1.) Pp. xxviii+63. Reading: University of Reading, Institute of Agricultural History, 1970. Paper, 85p.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

J. A. Richmond
Affiliation:
University College, Dublin

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 390 note 1 White seems anxious to combat the traditional view that latifundia perdidere Italiam. Despite White's article (B.I.C.S. xiv [1967], 62 sq.) the present reviewer is not convinced that latifundia did not cause depopulation and rural decay over much of Italy.

page 390 note 2 Add arbutus, cornus, corulus; the glandiferae (Plin. xvi. 6 sq.) also merit mention.

page 390 note 3 What would the author say to a student who referred him to ‘a well-known Attic vase’ (227)?

page 391 note 1 Cf. Crawford himself in Encyclopaedia Britannica 13, Supp. i. 197.

page 391 note 2 Cf. Rose, V., Anecdota Graeca et Graecolatina ii (Berlin, 1870), 129 sq.Google Scholar; ‘fragment (2)’ discusses much more than fruit.

page 391 note 3 Cf. Pliny xv. 9.

page 391 note 4 I see that Heitland (Agricola [Cambridge, 1921], 168) has made this point.

page 391 note 5 How does he reconcile this statement with the figures (Roman 42, U.K. 20 mandays per acre) on p. 414?

page 391 note 6 The conclusions on p. 183 take no account of the comparison with New England on p. 414.

page 392 note 1 I should add to the Bibliography: F. Orth, Der Feldbau der Römer, Prog. Frankf.- a.-M., 1900; Keightley, T., Notes on the Bucolics and Georgics of Virgil, London, 1846Google Scholar; Makkonen, O., Ancient Forestry: an Historical Study, i–ii, Helsinki, 19671969.Google Scholar