Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:25:42.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Goodwin's Greek Grammar - A Greek Grammar, by W. W. Goodwin. edition, revised and enlarged. (Macmillan & Co.: London and New York. 1894.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1896

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 66 note 3 That is, as the book is not intended to be learnt by heart, its scope may be extended without danger. Obviously, however, there must be some limit to scope of a school book.

page 67 note 1 Goodwin's note to § 624 (p. 144) is misleading as to the extent to which ῃ prevails in editions of the classics; onewould gather that it was limited to three editors (Kirchhoff, Wecklein, and Bergk). Compare Kühner-Blass, Greek Gram, ii. p. 60(3): ‘to introduce this -ει (a mere orthographic variant of the fourth and third century) into the older Attic writers such as Thucydides, Aristophanes, and the tragedians is absurd;in Demosthenes it is indifferent whether one spells in the one way or the other’; the Attic writers of the fourth and third century employed -〉 in the 3rd pers. sing, of the pres. indie, as well, and in the dat. sing, of the first declension.

page 68 note 1 A number of instances is given in the appendix to my Greek Grammar, p. 339 f.