Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:20:58.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glanis and Juvenal V. 104. (See C.R. LII. 56.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

L. R. Palmer ,
S. G. Owen  and
D'Arcy W. Thompson
L. R. Palmer
Affiliation:
University of Manchester
S. G. Owen
Affiliation:
Oxford
D'Arcy W. Thompson
Affiliation:
University of St. Andrews
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , September 1938 , pp. 115 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 116 note 1 Garrod accepts Galen's evidence and in writing ‘Tiberinus as a proper noun is unsupported from any Latin writer…’ was apparently unaware of Heraeus' interpretation of Hist. Aug. XVII. 17. 5. My case, however, rests on the imþossibility of Tiberinus; hence I was concerned to show that Galen's evidence is derivative. But if Tiberinus was possible as a fish name, then the point about the scholiast's nomen þiscis, which both Garrod and Rose have made, loses its cogency.

page 116 note 2 Garrod writes ‘glanis, a kind of shad’, a word on which the Concise Oxford Dictionary has ‘kinds of anadromous deep-bodied fish’.

page 118 note 1 For a full account see Theodore Gill, ‘Parental Care among Freshwater Fishes’, Smithsonian Inst. Proc., 1895; ‘The Remarkable Story of a Greek Fish, the Glanis’, ibid. 1907.