Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:57:19.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Esse Aliqvid Pvtemvs? - H. Bardon: Catulli Carmina. (Collection Latomus, 112.) Pp. 229. Brussels: Latomus, 1970. Paper, 375 B. fr.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

E. J. Kenney
E. J. Kenney
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1972 , pp. 212 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 212 note 1 I note that Bardon does not receive into his text any of the versions of 68. 47 trans-mitted by the recc.: sunt certi dmique fines.

page 212 note 2 See the second Aldine ed. (1515) of Met. ‘Lectori’ (= Naugerii Opera Omnia [Padua, 1728], 135): ‘nequis forte id suspicetur, abutinos uelle ueterum librorum authoritate, et quae nos emendauimus, ex illis credi emendata …’

page 212 note 3 See F. Robortello, De arte, siue ratione corrigendi veteres Authores, disputatio (Padua, 1557), fols. 2v, 7v–8 (= J. Gruter, Lampas, ii [1604], 18, 27);cf. A. Dain,Les Manuscrits 2 (1964), 162–3; A. Carlini, L'attività filologica di Francesco Robortello (1967), 22. On the delinquencies of H. Stephanus in this department see B. A. van Groningen, Traité d'histoire et de critique des textes grecs (1963), 70. This question of fides still bulked large in the next generation: see G. Scioppius, De Arte Critica (1662), **4–4v.

page 213 note 1 It is as well to observe the strict Madvigian convention that there is ex hypothesi only one archetype in a tradition,

page 213 note 2 This is not to deny this information historical value when it is properly used, e.g. to establish a stemma editionum: see the instructive Texte et apparat of A. Severyns (C.R. Lxxvii. 288–90).

page 213 note 3 Cf. the rejection of an easy remedy at 64 334 umquam tales. On hiatus see the important discussion by G. P. Goold, Phoenix, xxiii (1969), esp. 191–3.

page 213 note 4 See now O. Skutsch, B.I.C.S. xvi (1969), 41.