Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:25:37.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conjectures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

D. A. Slater
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 23 , Issue 8 , December 1909 , pp. 248 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1909

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The bold accusative (Styga) in this passage, —which the Oxford editor is inclined to emend,—is probably to be explained as modelled on the Virgilian ‘Itque reditque viam’ (Aen. vi. 122), just as the ‘eadem dea turbida’ of Thebaid, ii. 208, at which so many critics ride a tilt, is a mere reminiscence of Virgil's ‘Eddem impia Fama’ (Aen. iv. 298). Statius is full of such reminiscences as these.