Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:21:28.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Catullus, LXXXIV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. Harrison
E. Harrison
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 29 , Issue 7 , November 1915 , pp. 198 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1915

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 198 note 1 Pp. 137–139.

page 198 note 2 See the Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, February 10, 1910, and November 5, 1914.

page 198 note 3 Doubtless the occurrence of the same word at the end of the first and second couplets led to omission, a marginal supplement, and insertion in the wrong place.

page 198 note 4 One MS. (d) is said to have hinsiadas in l. 4 ; another (p), which embodies some conjectures made in the fifteenth century, has hyonios in l. 12. D has honios; but D dates from 1463, and the h may have been added after Politian's restoration of the poem.

page 198 note 5 L, which draws some things from O, has insidias haec, probably from misreading O's hee as hec. Schulze's M, which Hale has shown to be a copy of R, has hinsidias, forestalling Politian so far, it seems.

page 198 note 1 Crat. 427A ().

page 199 note 1 To the British Academy on July 22, 1908; to the Cambridge Philological Society on May 14, 1914 (Proceedings, 1914, p. 6). Professor Conway has very kindly read my paper in manuscript, and has bettered it in more than one place.

page 199 note 2 See particularly B. Schmidt's preface to his text. Schmidt collects evidence from Cisalpine inscriptions for the names of several of the poet's friends and foes ; and I see that two of Professor Conway's epitaphs from Este have the names iiuva.n.tsah and iuva.n.tiioh, which recall the Juventius of Catullus.