Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:30:42.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 16 , Issue 6 , July 1902 , pp. 331 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1902

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 332 note 1 In a recent number of the Classical Review (Feb. 1901, p. 23) Mrdrew, HeadlamGoogle Scholar attention to the epigram of the Emperor Julian on ‘Wine made from barley.’ Both Mr. Headlam and (before him) Hehn see in the Epigram two puns. Stephanos (s.v. τράγος) rightly noted a third, in τράγος—non hircum sed ex olyra et tritico confectum panem intelligebat. I would suggest vinum confectum.

page 336 note 1 Whether the last two cippi belong to the Anio Vetus or to the Marcia is doubtful: but on the first (No. 626) the name of the aqueduct can be clearly read, and the second, from its position, must belong to the same aqueduct.