Article contents
The Arcadian League and Aristodemos
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
Abstract
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1925
References
page 104 note 1 The cases then known are given in Hiller von Gaertringen's Testimonies to I.G. V. ii. (19I3), unfortunately with Pomtow's now obsolete dating; but apparently he did not draw the obvious deduction.
page 104 note 2 I.G. V. ii. 549, 550=Syll? 314, where see Killer's notes.
page 104 note 3 Supp. Ep. Gr. 1, 75, 1. 23; see Cary, Class. Quart. 1922, p. 142.
page 104 note 4 See Bourguet on Fouilles III. 43.
page 105 note 1 B.C.H. 38, 1914, p. 451, no. 1.
page 105 note 2 Ib. p. 466, no. 9, with Plassart and Blum's commentary.
page 105 note 3 G.D.I. 2563 to 2566; Aristagoras also Syll.3 424.
page 105 note 4 Tarn, Antigonos Gonatas, 358, n. 43.
page 105 note 5 Emmenidas' dates. Pomtow in 1914, 267; in 1923, 255 for certain. Johnson 259. De Sanctis in 1923, 255/4 or 252/1. Beloch in 1902, 260; in 1923, 256 for certain; in 1924, 252/1, or possibly 251/0. Roussel in 1923, probably 359. This list speaks for itself.
page 105 note 6 De Sanctis, Riv. di fil. 1923, 167; Beloch, ib. 1923, 267, and 1924, 192.
page 105 note 7 With the articles given in the last note cf. Roussel, B.C.H. 1923, 1, and Rev.Et. Anc. 1924 1; Walek, Rev. Phil. 1924, 5; Kirchner, Phil.Woch. 1924, 869.The problems of Athens and Delphi are interconnected.
page 105 note 8 Syll.3 430 (see Roussel, B.C.H. 1923, p. 30). Even Pomtow now accepts Areus II.; Klio 18, 1923, 308.
page 106 note 1 B.C.H. 27, 1903, p. 23; cf. Pomtow, Klio8, 1908, p. 193, n. 1.
page 106 note 2 Curt. 10, 1, 3; see Tarn, J.H.S. 1921, p. 14.
page 106 note 3 See Roussel in B.C.H. 1923, p. 4.
page 107 note 1 B.C.H. 38, 1914, 466, no. 9.
- 1
- Cited by