Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-mggfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T05:34:21.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anth. Pal. v. 244 (245). 3–4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

A. Y. Campbell
A. Y. Campbell
Affiliation:
Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 1953 , pp. 13
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cic. Fam. vii. 12. 2; cf. Warde Fowler, Roman Ideas of Religion, p. 39.

2 e.g. Hdt. iii. 8; Livy i. 24. 9 saxo silice (a stone knife).

3 I owe my acquaintance with these solely to the app. crit. of Stadtmüller (Teubner, 1894), and to the statement in the Didot ed. that Lennep was refuted by Passow, Script. Misc. p. 219.

4 e.g. in the next piece but one, from Theocritus.

5 Cf. particularly in the following piece (Paul. Sil.) Ψυχ⋯ δ' ⋯Ξ ⋯δ⋯μαντος.