No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 October 2009
page 334 note 1 Evidently the phrase here is used out of its ordinary sense, and is the survival of 
.
page 334 note 2 Λ 455 
. The testimony of the MSS. which are unanimous for 
, shows clearly that this was the reading of the κοιναl; but what are we to make of 
I know of no parallel expression.
page 335 note 1 Corrupt.
page 336 note 1 It is further to be considered that in many double versions of scholia (A 298, 424, 553; r 99; E 231; Z 4, 121; H 171, 197; Θ 163; K 291, 341; λ 146, 439; M 142, 161, 283, 318; N 485, 705; O 307; T 114; φ 492; Ψ 548, 622) Ἀρσταρχος = Ἀρσταρχος κα α πλɛονς(or authorities by name). We may therefore assume that a certain number of passages under Has. are to be raised to I.
page 336 note 2 Agreements of Zenodotus with theκοιν are numerous under the heading IIb.; (A 434; B 53, 196; E 466; H 451; Θ 378; I 128, 564; A 219, 368, 437, 439; M 161, 340; N 423, 447, 449; Ξ 118, 208, 249, 322, 437; O 139, 459; II 188, 507; P 171; Σ 34; ϒ 11, 138 : Ψ 307; Ω 486), that is to say Zenodotus as against Aristarchus agrees with many or most of our MSS.