Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:19:13.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Notes on Propertius

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

D. M. Jones
D. M. Jones*
Affiliation:
Wesffield College, London.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , December 1961 , pp. 197 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 He used chiefly Ruaeus's Delphin edition (see Bottkol, J. McG., Mod. Phil., 1943, pp. 244 f.)Google Scholar, but tells us‘I have forsaken Ruaeus (whom generally I follow) in many places, and made Expositions of my own in some, quite contrary to him’. Ruaeus has exilium in the second of our passages, but exitium in the first.