Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:05:49.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pompeius' freedman biographer again

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

Susan Treggiari
Susan Treggiari
Affiliation:
London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , December 1969 , pp. 264 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 264 note 1 Cf. P. Oxy. 905, 11. 16–18, and edd. ad loc.

page 264 note 2 C.R. lxxx (1966), 271 ff.

page 264 note 3 Suetonian manuscripts have Voltacilius, Voltatilius, Volcatius, volacilius, Oltacilius, Octacilius, and otacilius. Those of Macrobius have votacilius, which Casaubon corrected to Otacilius.

page 265 note 1 Contra Robinson, , ed. C. Suetoni Tranquillide Gr. et Rhet. (Paris, 1925), ad loc.Google Scholar

page 265 note 2 Robinson (loc. cit.) argues wrongly on the ground that no Voltacilii Ploti are known. The patron's family would not exhibit this cognomen, nor would a freedman's son necessarily perpetuate it. Lewis's suspicion that the earlier mention by Suetonius of Plotius Gallus led Jerome to make a slip is unconvincing if the name in Jerome's copy was Pitholaus. Again, if we postulate an earlier corruption, it is hard to see how a scribe would have written the non-existent ‘Pilutus’ for a familiar Greek name.

page 265 note 3 Cf. Rudd, W. J. N., C.Q. liv (1960), 170f.Google Scholar

page 265 note 4 If the above explanation does not press a joke too far, it will be a double bluff: of course a Rhodian could use Greek, of course a Roman freedman could use Latin.

page 266 note 1 Cf. Suet. Gr. 7, 11, 18; Sen. Contr. x. 5. 22; Pliny, N.H. xxxv. 200.

page 266 note 2 Cf. Suet. Gr. 13 (Staberius Eros freed ‘propter litterarum studium’); Cic. Fam. xvi. 16. 2 (one of the motives for freeing Tiro).

page 266 note 3 For litigation on behalf of the patron cf. Cic. Scaur. 23.

page 266 note 4 Suetonius almost always identifies the patron, just as he mentions nationality if known.

page 266 note 5 It was because of this that Jerome made the error of supposing that Plotus was Pompey's freedman. For the clientela of freedmen cf. Cic. Rosc. Am. 19, Att. i. 12. 2; Suet. Gr. 12. The mistake occurs in App. B.C. iii. 94; cf. Veil. ii. 73. 3.

page 266 note 6 Suet. Gr. 12; Cic. Fam. xiii. 16; Sen. Contr. x. 5. 22.