Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:18:22.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plautinische Forschungen - Plautinische Forschungen. By F. Leo. Second edition. Berlin: Weidmann, 1912. 11s.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

E. A. Sonnenschein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 27 , Issue 7 , November 1913 , pp. 237 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 237 note 1 On the thorny question of ‘contaminatio’ Leo's views have been challenged since the appearance of his second edition by Lindsay, in berl. Phil. Woch., 1912, p. 1, 637Google Scholar; by Prescott, H. W. W. in Classical Philology, 1913, p. 14 ffGoogle Scholar. (on the Amphitruo): on the other hand, the theory of contaminatio has been extended by Miss C. C. Coulter, ibid., p. 57 ff., to the Rudens.

page 237 note 2 Ancient Editions of Plautus, reviewed by me in the Classical Review, 1905, vol. xix. pp. 312 ffGoogle Scholar.

page 238 note 1 Of course, if there were no instance of this particular word magis in which the s was necessarily sounded, the suspicion might arise that the Romans of Plautus' time always said magi or mage. But that is not the case (e.g. Asin. 162).

page 239 note 1 But I cannot accept his scansion of Trin. 658 (p. 276); for it brings an unaccented syllable into the fifth rise (the last syllable of otto). See my article on Accent and Quantity in Classical Review (1906, vol. xx., p. 156 f.)Google Scholar.