Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:23:05.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labienus and the Status of the Picene Town Cingulum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

L. R. Taylor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 35 , Issue 7-8 , November 1921 , pp. 158 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 158 note 1 Schulze, , Zur Geschichte lateinischer Eigennatnen, 105Google Scholar. The peculiar form of this nomen, unusual among magistrates of the Republic, doubtless explains the persistence, in spite of frequent corrections, of references to Labienus under the nomen Attius. See, for instance, the indices of the Clarendon and Teubner texts of Caesar. The error which dates from the Renaissance was probably due originally to a misunderstanding of Bell. Hisp. 31, where Labienus and Attius Varus are mentioned together without a connecting word.

page 158 note 2 On this trial see Ed. Meyer's recent discussion in Caesar's Monarchie und das Principal des Pompeius (1917), 543–557.

page 159 note 1 On the praefecturae in Picenum see Frank, , Klio, 1911, 373–376Google Scholar.

page 159 note 2 Cf. Mommsen, , CIL. IX., p. 541Google Scholar; Huelsen, s.v. Cingulum, Pauly-Wissowa. There is no evidence for Huelsen's statement that Cingulum was founded by Labienus in 63, the year of his tribunate.

page 159 note 3 Cf. Mommsen, , Staatsrecht, III. 797Google Scholar.