Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:22:45.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Eion Epigram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

A. W. Gomme
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 5 note 1 Such literary amplification of epigrams inscribed on stone can be paralleled, e.g. by the epitaph on the Corinthians who fell at Salamis (see Tod, Gk. Hist. Inscr., no. 16).

page 5 note 2 The order of the words in Ἀθπ. makes it clear that Ἀλκμεωνιδ⋯ν is genitive after πρότερον (as Hude and Kenyon), not a partitive with Kedon (as Mathieu—Haussouiller).

page 6 note 1 Note particularly Od. iii. 84–5.

page 7 note 1 See Raubitschek, , Hesp. x, 1941, 284295CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for the latest text and discussion. His conclusions about the number of names recorded, especially his suggestion that 40 of the 100 were metics, are not convincing.