No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a516/9a51678701e202111731afd1a25c5af2841b72c2" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1951
References
page 129 note 1 As I indicated in C.R. 1. p. 54, n. 4.
page 129 note 2 But if such was his meaning, why did he not write ἀγκάλaις?—which does not require ἐν; cf. L.S.J.
page 130 note 1 But where is ‘head’? Why, in Homer: Od. xiv. 494, etc.
page 131 note 1 See, e.g., Il. xiv. 213; xxii. 503; Od. xi. 261; Agam. 723 (with either reading).
page 131 note 2 There is a complication at 1579.
page 131 note 3 e.g. Jebb confuses windward and leeward. I hope some day to publish a clarification.
page 131 note 3 Hermann, too, admitted that this was a possibility.