No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 March 2017
(1) qua re flecte te, quaeso, et maiores tuos respice atque ita guberna rem publicam ut natum esse te ciues tui gaudeant: sine quo nec beatus nec c[l]arus nec †unctus† quisquam esse omni<no> potest. (1.35)
1 (Leipzig, 19862). Other cited editions: A.C. Clark (Oxford, 19182); G. Magnaldi (Alessandria, 2008); G. Manuwald (Berlin and New York, 2007); J.T. Ramsey (Cambridge, 2003); D.R. Shackleton Bailey (Chapel Hill, 1986, repr. with slight revisions by J.T. Ramsey and G. Manuwald [Cambridge, MA and London, 2009]).
2 Is the l in the transmitted clarus perhaps an example of reinsertion in the wrong place by a ‘corrector’?
3 Duly registered in Fedeli's apparatus criticus. Shackleton Bailey and Ramsey, too, resort to cruces. Magnaldi ingeniously suggests that cum uinus conceals comminus, which she would insert prior to consulem (Faernus's conjecture, which she adopts, for consul), with a comma following esset. But the adverb is unnecessary, and the interruption of the phrase tamquam si esset consul implausible.
4 Cf. OLD s.v. unus 2b.
5 It is rejected, but without argument, by Fedeli and Magnaldi, who print the transmitted text.
6 Rawson, E., Roman Culture and Society (Oxford, 1991), 31 Google Scholar.
7 I would like to thank the Editor and the journal's reader for helpful comments on an earlier draft.