No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Annals, i. 31. 4: ‘implere ceterorum rudes animos: uenisse tempus quo…’. Implore has been suspected and impellere has been suggested. Andresen says ‘implere… womit, zeigen die folgenden Reden. Curt. x. 1. 28 credulas regis aures implebat’. The passage of Curtius continues not with an accusative and infinitive but with the words dissitnulans causam irae. A better defence is to be seen in Livy, xlv. 31. 6.
page 91 note 1 Moore mistranslates several other passages: see, for instance, i. 4. 3, 17. 1, 19. 2, 36. 2, 49. 3, 58. 1, 89. 2; ii. 22. 2, 24. 3; iii. 20. 3, 80. 2; iv. 72. 4; v. 17. 1. Even names and numbers are a trouble to him at i. 67. 2; ii. 19. 2, 94. 2; iii. 7. 1, 35. 2, 73. 2; v. 14.1.
page 91 note 2 Miscellaneous Writings, p. xiv.
page 91 note 3 Sitzungsb. d. Preuss. Akad. d. Wiss., Phil.Hist. Klasse, 1934, p. 635.
page 92 note 1 Gercke-Norden, , Einl. in d. Altertumswissenschaft, I 3 (Leipzig, 1927), part 4, p. 115Google Scholar.