Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:05:08.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Seneca's Quaestiones Naturales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

D. R. Shackleton Bailey
D. R. Shackleton Bailey
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

‘In spite of the efforts of scholars to improve matters, the condition of Seneca's text remains in many places most uncertain or quite irrecoverable. Again and again one has to be content with conjectures which, while often giving the general sense of a passage, must not be taken as certainly Seneca's words’ (Corcoran).

1. praef. 5 o quam contempta res est homo, nisi supra humana surrexerit! quam diu cum affectibus colluctamur, quid magnifici facimus, etiam si superiores sumus? portenta vincimus: quid est cur suspiciamus nosmet ipsos, quia dissimiles deterrimis sumus? Traditional punctuation: ‘… quid magnifici facimus? etiam si superiores sumus, portenta vincimus’

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , December 1979 , pp. 448 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Note the following: ‘Alexander’ = Alexander, W. H., ‘Naturales Quaestiones’, Publ. in Class. Pbil. of University of California 13 (1948), 241 ff.Google Scholar; ‘Axelson’ = Axelson, B., Senecastudien (Lund, 1933)Google Scholar; ‘Corcoran’ = Corcoran, T. H., ed. Loeb (1971–1972)Google Scholar; ‘Gercke’ = Gercke, A., ed. Teubner (1907);Google Scholar ‘Oltramare’ = Oltramare, P., ed. Bude (1929);Google Scholar ‘Schultess’ = Schultess, F., Annaeana Studia (1888).Google Scholar Manuscript readings are cited from Gercke's apparatus.

I am grateful to the Editors and to Mr. H. M. Hine of Edinburgh University for allowing me to read and make use of his comments on this paper.