No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Notes on Dionysius Periegetes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
The recent publication of a new edition of Dionysius Periegetes, the first since 1861, and the first ever to provide adequate information about the MS. tradition, has no doubt stimulated many of us to re-read this author, a rotten geographer but a competent versifier and recycler of Alexandrian flosculi. The new recension is a distinct improvement on Müller's, and the collection of citations and parallels is a valuable complement to the critical apparatus. Here are half a dozen suggestions for further amelioration of the text.
- Type
- Shorter Notes
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1992
References
1 Tsavari, Isabella O., Διονυσ⋯ου Ἀλεξανδρ⋯ως Oἰκουμ⋯ης Περι⋯γησις. Kριτικ⋯ ἒκδοση (Ioannina, 1990)Google Scholar. See reviews by Reeve, M. D., CR 41 (1991), 306–9Google Scholar, and Degani, E., Eikasmos. Quaderni Bolognesi di Filologia Classica, ii (1991), pp. 413–15.Google Scholar
2 One or two citations have been overlooked: 310 Suda v 269 (noted by Degani); 537 Et. Gen. s.v. ἱ⋯ερτ⋯ς; 912 Et. Gen. s.v. Β⋯βλος; 947 Et. Gen. s.v. ἒθειρα (= ‘Callim. fr. an. 120 Schn.’ cited by Tsavari as a model for Dionysius).
3 Word-end following contracted second biceps (and moreover with a short vowel in the biceps); cf. my Greek Metre, pp. 155 and 178. Dionysius has δέ τοι καί in the same position in the verse at 372, 541 v.1., 935, 961.
4 Hesych. ι 1135, St. Byz. s.v. Ίχανα, Choerob. in An. Ox. ii.222.6, Et. M. 478.47.
5 Philol. 110 (1966), 165.Google Scholar