Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T11:25:53.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Note on Terence, Andria 532

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

J. D. Craig
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The traces of real, that is, ancient, rival versions of Terence's lines are not so pronounced as of Plautus' lines. Professor Lindsay has drawn attention to a possible instance at Hec. 468 (‘Notes on the Text of Terence,’ C.Q. Vol. XIX., No. i, p. 33). Another seems to be Andr. 532 (‘atque adeo in ipso tempore ecce ipsum [obuiam] Cbremem’), if I am right in supposing that the text used by Donatus had ipsum Chremem. A trace of the variant survives in the unmetrical δ-setting ipsum obuiam Chremem DGL. The text of the other minuscule MSS. has ipsum obuiam. A is not in evidence for this part of Andria. Had it too ipsum Chremem ?

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 20 , Issue 3-4 , July 1926 , pp. 200
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)