Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:09:44.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Canonicity of Homer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Extract

The view of Homer which I have attempted to expound in articles recently contributed to this and other journals may be stated as follows: an individual, father of the children, first natural then spiritual, who bore his name and worshipped him, lived in Chios, of which island he was so much the glory that ‘ Chian ’ in the mouth of Simonides, himself a professional and an islander, means ‘ Homer.’ He was not blind, like his disciple the Chian Cynaethus, but seeing: he selected, arranged, adorned and expanded two episodes in the stock of saga (whether continuous or already disposed in separate poems) which the colonists brought with them from Europe.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 221 note 1 It is later for instance than many recorded dates of settlements

page 222 note 1 Henning′s Homers Odyssee, 1903, pp. 221, 259

page 222 note 2 E.g. the statement in schol. Pind. Ntm. II. init.

page 222 note 3 I include all variants—readings of actual MSS., quotations, readings explicitly recorded by scholia and readings favoured by ancient scholars, without distinction.

page 223 note 1 B 565 V 27 Certamen 296 for is possibly from Hesiod. The corruption of IIηρεÍη B 766 into IIερÍη also may be due Theophrasto Hesiod, who first locates the Muses there (O.D.1). n 857 áςρττα for áγςρττα is uncertain: áςρτσΝΝη occurs Hes. O.D. 471, but áδρÓς first in Herodotus, áδρÓγης in Theophrastous.

page 224 note 1 Reading Í for ςÍ I withdraw my previous suggestion.

page 224 note 2 The variant is perhaps connected with the ed. of the younger Euripides, C.S. 1901, 347.

page 225 note 1 From an old variant in Homer?

page 225 note 2 So we must read: σσατ MSS. Rhianus extended the figurative use to abstracts: ‘ they did on death,’ i.e. the death-portending feathers fell upon them. This favours in the same line.

page 227 note 1 See CM., Sept. 1913.

page 230 note 1 There are other testimonies for Egyptian participation in the siege of Troy: e.g., Demetrius (F.H.O. IV. 383), the Aethiopians going to Troy under Tithonus when they heard of Memnon′s death cast down w their crowns at Abydos.

page 231 note 1 I quote two for their coincidence with that gramrock of offence which did not awake ancient suspicion: Beside these the Alexandrians detected gram, matical supplements, intended to ease a construction or elucidate a meaning. I collected some C.R. 1902,1 sqq. The origin of these passages in most cases escapes us; it is natural they should be personal invention.

page 232 note 1 With Bunbury and Vollgraff I am clear that Dolichium (Doulichium is only a metrical length-ening) is the later Leucas. SeeJ.H.S. 1910, 304. It must be so till someone finds another island in these parts, capable of growing enough corn to trade in it and of raising a sufficient population to provide Meges with forty ships. The name belongs to a village on the south slope of Pindus, and hangs as an echo round one of the Echinades. There is no reason why it should have meant ‘ long,’ unless Port Isaac in Cornwall is to be connected with the patriarch. Strabo I.e. appears to have thought that the old name of Leucas was . He knew that Leucas and Cephallenia had changed their names, but no ancient imagined that Ithaca and Zacynthus were unoriginal.

page 233 note 1 The (Strabo 452, E.G.F. p. 77 Jr. 5) also contained Ulyssean genealogies, but its subject is too early for it to have included Ulysses′ last days.