Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:40:49.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Rubric in the Propylaia Accounts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Wesley E. Thompson
Wesley E. Thompson
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Meritt, Wade-Gery, and McGregor have interpreted the rubric to signify that the Hellenotamiai transferred to the commissioners of the Propylaia any un-expended funds left from a grant of money authorized by the demos for a given military campaign. While this idea of surplus funds seems a perfectly possible explanation, I would suggest an alternative, that the Hellenotamiai transferred to the commissioners of the Propylaia an aparche of booty collected by an Athenian expeditionary force. Herodotus and Xenophon4 mention the dekate from the booty of several battles, and Thucydides speaks of the dedication of spoils as a customary procedure.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , May 1970 , pp. 39 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 39 note 1 ATL iii. 329–32; after we have the name of the commander of the expedition; after the name of the Hellenotamias in charge of the transaction.Google Scholar

page 39 note 2 Ibid.

page 39 note 3 5. 77. 4, 8. 27. 5, 9. 81. 1.

page 39 note 4 Hell. 3. 5. 5, 4. 3. 21.Google Scholar

page 39 note 5 3. 57. 1. He also mentions the dedication of booty from various battles: 2. 13. 4, 3. 114. 1,4. 134. 1.

page 39 note 6 Hdt. 5. 77. 4.

page 39 note 7 IG ii 2. 403Google Scholar, which has been restored with the phrase Incidentally, Demosthenes dedicated his share of the booty to various deities: cf. Thuc, . 3. 114. 1.Google Scholar

page 39 note 8 IG i 2. 342–3.Google Scholar

page 39 note 9 ATL ii. D 1, lines 30–2.Google Scholar

page 39 note 10 The sources of income in the extant portions of the Propylaia accounts, IG i 2. 363–7Google Scholar, are the sale of building materials and skins (cf. Dinsmoor, , AJA xvii [1913], 385), the rental of a sacred house, the aparche of the tribute, lump sums from the treasurers of Athena, contributions from individuals, and revenues from a mine called the Hephaistikon. All but this last are easily identified as sacred moneys. Athena's stake in the mine is uncertain.Google Scholar

page 39 note 11 IG i 2. 340, 342, 347, 352, 364, 366.Google Scholar

page 39 note 12 IG i 2. 342–3, 347–8, 364–6.Google Scholar

page 39 note 13 IG i 2. 363–4, 367.Google Scholar

page 39 note 14 IG i 2. 350.Google Scholar

page 39 note 15 Cf. Dinsmoor, , loc. cit. 386.Google Scholar

page 40 note 1 Dmsmoor 305.

page 40 note 2 IG i 2. 342–3Google Scholar. The xenodikai are probably connected with the revision of the citizenship lists in 445/4, mentioned by Philochoros (F. Gr. Hist. 328Google Scholar F 119) and Plutarch, , Perikles, 37Google Scholar. 4. If anyone was sold into slavery or had his property confiscated we can expect that the customary tithe (cf. IG i 2. 22, 39, 45) was given to Athena.Google Scholar