Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T05:12:57.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Propertius 1.9.30

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

Allan Kershaw
Allan Kershaw
Affiliation:
Penn State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some time ago I noted that the generally accepted emendations a! fuge (1.9.30), and a! ducere (1.11.5) are suspect (CPh 75 (1980), 71–2). In his recent Loeb edition (Cambridge, Mass. 1990), Goold in the latter passage restores the MSS. reading adducere; in the former, quisquis es assiduas aufuge blanditias, he prints Tappe's tu fuge for MSS. aufuge. The best solution, it seems to me, is one which the modern editions, Propertiana included, are of a mind to ignore: Markland's heu fuge.

Type
Shorter Notes
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , May 1992 , pp. 282
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Aufugio seems to be used only intransitively. In addition to the passages adduced by Shackleton, Bailey, Propertiana (Cambridge, 1956), p. 28Google Scholar, I note also Petronius 81.3 effugi iudicium] effugi Ip 2: aufugi rtp 1.