Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:53:30.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Pindar Olympian II. 56–60

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

H. T. Deas
H. T. Deas
Affiliation:
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Classical Quarterly , Volume 24 , Issue 3-4 , July 1930 , pp. 191 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 191 note 1 This view may be conjecturally ascribed to Didymus (1)as being directly, and immediately, opposed to that of Aristarchus; (2) as being followed in the paraphrase (Sch. 105a); (3) cf. Sch. P. VII. 4 δ Δδυμος πλοστερν κοει.

page 192 note 1 Cf. Lehrs, Die Pindarscholim, p. 16 sqq.

page 192 note 2 This is not, of course, Chrysippus of Soli, but a grammarian, a pupil of Aristarchus, who seems to come, in point of time, between Aristarchus and Didymus; cf. Körte, A., Rhein. Mus. 55 (1900), p. 131Google Scholar.

page 192 note 3 For this to us extraordinary supplement, apparently quite wanton and groundless, cf. Sch.O. II. 117c, where παρ τιμς θεν is rendered by παρ τοτις διατρβουσι τοῖς τιμωνοις ὑ π θεν, and Sch. P. IV. 113a, where ὲν is similarly inserted.